Skip to Content
L. Patrick Mulligan & Associates, LLC L. Patrick Mulligan & Associates, LLC
Call Us Today! 937-685-7006

Common Grounds for Criminal Appeals

Criminal appeals are a crucial part of the legal system allowing individuals convicted of a crime to challenge the case outcome. These appeals typically arise when defendants believe they have experienced an unfair trial or received an unjustly harsh sentence. The appellate process enables individuals to seek a review of their case by a higher court to rectify any errors or injustices that may have occurred during their initial trial.

The importance of the appellate process in the criminal justice system cannot be overstated. It is a vital safeguard against wrongful convictions and excessive penalties, ensuring that justice is upheld and defendants’ rights are protected. By allowing a fresh review of a case by a higher court, the appellate process provides an opportunity to identify and correct errors or misconduct that may have occurred during the trial.

Consulting with experienced appellate counsel in Dayton, such as L. Patrick Mulligan & Associates, LLC, can provide invaluable assistance in navigating the complexities of the process and seeking justice. Contact us at (937) 685-7006.

Appeals Must Be Based on Prejudicial Legal Errors

Legal errors can occur during criminal trials in various forms, ranging from mistakes in jury instructions and evidentiary rulings to legal interpretations. These errors can significantly impact the defendant's right to a fair trial.

The right to a fair trial is a fundamental constitutional right, and any errors compromising this right can lead to a wrongful conviction or an unjust sentence. Legal mistakes can result in the defendant being denied a fair opportunity to present their case and may violate their due process rights.

For a legal error to be grounds for appeal, it must be prejudicial, meaning it must have substantially affected the case outcome. If it can be shown that someone involved in the case, such as the judge, prosecutor, or defense attorney, did not comply with the law and that this non-compliance resulted in an unfair trial or an unjust outcome, it may provide a basis for a criminal appeal.

Ineffective Assistance of Counsel

The Sixth Amendment of the United States Constitution guarantees the right to effective assistance of counsel for individuals facing criminal charges. This right recognizes that competent legal representation is essential to ensure a fair and just criminal trial. When an attorney's performance falls below expected standards for the legal profession, it may be considered ineffective assistance of counsel.

The right to effective assistance of counsel means that defendants can have legal representation that is competent, diligent, and provides the level of advocacy expected of a skilled attorney.

Attorneys are expected to provide their clients with a zealous defense, which includes the following:

  • Thorough investigation
  • Strategic planning
  • Skillful advocacy
  • Competent representation at all stages of the criminal process

Not all errors by an attorney rise to the level of ineffective assistance of counsel. The standard for proving ineffective assistance of counsel is that the attorney's performance fell below the objective standards of reasonableness and that this deficiency resulted in prejudice to the defendant's case, meaning it had a substantial effect on the outcome.

Prosecutorial Misconduct

Prosecutorial misconduct refers to unethical or improper behavior by a prosecutor during a criminal trial.

This misconduct can include the following:

  • Withholding exculpatory evidence
  • Making improper arguments to the jury
  • Engaging in unethical behavior
  • Misstating the law

Prosecutorial misconduct can have profound consequences, including wrongful convictions, and serve as grounds for criminal appeals.

One form of prosecutorial misconduct is the withholding of exculpatory evidence, which is evidence that could potentially prove the innocence of the defendant. Prosecutors are legally obligated to disclose any evidence favorable to the defendant, which could impeach the credibility of prosecution witnesses or undermine the prosecution's case. When prosecutors fail to disclose such evidence, it can result in an unfair trial and wrongful conviction. In such cases, a criminal appeal may be warranted to challenge the conviction based on prosecutorial misconduct.

Unethical behavior by prosecutors, such as engaging in misconduct during the investigation or trial, can also be a basis for a criminal appeal.

This behavior can include the following:

  • Intimidating witnesses
  • Tampering with evidence
  • Engaging in other unethical practices that undermine the fairness and integrity of the criminal justice system

Prosecutors have a duty to uphold the highest ethical standards and to seek justice, not just convictions. Failure to do so can result in wrongful convictions and may be challenged through the appellate process.

Additionally, prosecutorial misconduct can occur when a prosecutor misstates the law to the jury. Prosecutors must present the applicable law accurately and fairly, and misstatements can result in an unfair trial and wrongful conviction. For example, if a prosecutor misleads the jury about the legal elements of a crime or misapplies the law to the facts of the case, it can result in an unjust verdict and provide grounds for a criminal appeal.

Evidence Errors

In criminal trials, the admission or exclusion of evidence plays a critical role in determining the case's outcome.

Judges are responsible for deciding what evidence is allowed or not allowed in a case based on the rules of evidence and legal standards. However, judges can make mistakes or misinterpret the law when making these decisions.

One common type of evidence error is when the judge improperly admits or excludes evidence. For example, a judge may admit evidence that should have been excluded because it is irrelevant, unreliable, or unfairly prejudicial to the defendant. Conversely, a judge may exclude evidence that should have been admitted because it is important to the defense's case. Such errors in the admission or exclusion of evidence can significantly impact the trial's fairness.

Similarly, evidence errors can also occur with juries. Juries are responsible for evaluating the evidence presented at trial and making decisions based on the facts, not their personal feelings or biases. However, in some cases, juries may make errors in their decision-making process. For example, a jury may convict a defendant even though the evidence is insufficient to prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.

Sentencing Errors

The sentencing phase of a criminal trial is crucial in determining the appropriate punishment for a convicted defendant. However, like any other stage of the criminal justice system, errors can occur during the sentencing process, leading to appeals and possible sentence modifications.

One common type of sentencing error is the improper application of sentencing guidelines. Sentencing guidelines are rules and recommendations helping judges determine the appropriate sentence based on the nature of the offense and the defendant's criminal history.

However, judges may make mistakes such as the following in applying these guidelines:

  • Misinterpreting them
  • Using the wrong one
  • Failing to consider relevant factors

These errors can result in an unjust sentence that does not accurately reflect the defendant's culpability or the severity of the offense.

Another type of sentencing error is the miscalculation of sentences. Sentences are often calculated based on several factors, such as the offense severity, prior criminal history, and applicable statutory guidelines. However, mistakes can be made in calculating the length or type, resulting in an incorrect sentence being imposed. For example, a judge may erroneously impose a sentence that exceeds the statutory maximum or fail to give credit for time served or other mitigating factors.

Schedule a Consultation Today

Navigating the appellate process can be complex and challenging, requiring a deep understanding of the law and appellate procedures. Therefore, it is crucial for defendants wishing to appeal their criminal convictions or sentences to seek legal help. Appellate attorneys have the knowledge, skills, and experience to effectively identify and challenge legal errors and other grounds for appeal.

At L. Patrick Mulligan & Associates, LLC, we provide legal assistance in Dayton. Call (937) 685-7006 or contact us online today.